为 NavigableMap 编写同步的线程安全包装器
java.util.Collections
目前提供以下实用方法来为各种集合接口创建 synchronized
包装器:
synchronizedCollection(Collection<T>c)
synchronizedList(List
list) synchronizedMap(Map
m) synchronizedSet(Set
s) synchronizedSortedMap(SortedMap
m) synchronizedSortedSet(SortedSet
s)
类似地,它也有 6 个 unmodifiedXXX
重载.
Analogously, it also has 6 unmodifiedXXX
overloads.
这里明显的遗漏是 的实用方法NavigableMap
.extends SortedMap
确实如此,但 SortedSet extends Set
和 Set extends Collection
和 Collections
也有SortedSet
和 Set
的专用实用方法.大概 NavigableMap
是一个有用的抽象,否则它一开始就不会存在,但它没有实用方法.
The glaring omission here are the utility methods for NavigableMap<K,V>
. It's true that it extends SortedMap
, but so does SortedSet extends Set
, and Set extends Collection
, and Collections
have dedicated utility methods for SortedSet
and Set
. Presumably NavigableMap
is a useful abstraction, or else it wouldn't have been there in the first place, and yet there are no utility methods for it.
所以问题是:
Collections
没有为NavigableMap
提供实用方法有什么具体原因吗?- 您将如何为
NavigableMap
编写自己的synchronized
包装器?- 浏览
Collections.java
的 OpenJDK 版本的源代码似乎表明这只是一个机械"过程- 是不是一般可以像这样添加
synchronized
线程安全特性? - 如果是这样一个机械过程,能否实现自动化?(Eclipse 插件等)
- 这种代码重复是必要的,还是可以通过不同的 OOP 设计模式避免?
- Is there a specific reason why
Collections
doesn't provide utility methods forNavigableMap
? - How would you write your own
synchronized
wrapper forNavigableMap
?- Glancing at the source code for OpenJDK version of
Collections.java
seems to suggest that this is just a "mechanical" process- Is it true that in general you can add
synchronized
thread-safetiness feature like this? - If it's such a mechanical process, can it be automated? (Eclipse plug-in, etc)
- Is this code repetition necessary, or could it have been avoided by a different OOP design pattern?
推荐答案
这是一个疏忽.修复正在进行中.
乔希写道:
他们绝对属于那里.他们的缺席是无意的.
我们应该尽快把它们放进去.""They definitely belong there. Their absence is unintentional.
We should put them in as soon as possible."我同意,尽管我们没有一个工程师期待编写(和测试)所有那些令人麻木的转发方法.发布日期:2006-08-21 00:50:41.0
I agree, even though none of us engineers are looking forward to writing (and testing) all those mind-numbing forwarding methods. Posted Date : 2006-08-21 00:50:41.0
这需要一些时间.
更新:至于手动实现,你可以考虑劫持
java.util
包,因为你想扩展static class SynchronizedSortedMap
被声明为包私有.否则它将是大量的代码复制粘贴.下面是开场白:Update: as to manually implementing it, you may consider to hijack the
java.util
package since you would like to extendstatic class SynchronizedSortedMap<K, V>
which is declared package private. Else it's going to be a lot of code copypaste. Here's a kickoff:package java.util; import java.util.Collections.SynchronizedSortedMap; public class NewCollections { public static <K, V> NavigableMap<K, V> synchronizedNavigableMap(NavigableMap<K, V> m) { return new SynchronizedNavigableMap<K, V>(m); } static class SynchronizedNavigableMap<K, V> extends SynchronizedSortedMap<K, V> implements NavigableMap<K, V> { private final NavigableMap<K, V> sm; SynchronizedNavigableMap(NavigableMap<K, V> m) { super(m); sm = m; } SynchronizedNavigableMap(NavigableMap<K, V> m, Object mutex) { super(m, mutex); sm = m; } } }
让 IDE 自动生成
NavigableMap
的未实现方法,并以与SynchronizedSortedMap
相同的方式对它们进行编码.这是一个例子:Let the IDE autogenerate the unimplemented methods of
NavigableMap
and code them the same way asSynchronizedSortedMap
does. Here's ONE example:@Override public K ceilingKey(K key) { synchronized (mutex) { return sm.ceilingKey(key); } }
请注意,返回例如
Set
的方法您也需要将其包装在SynchronizedSet
中.再次,请参阅SynchronizedMap
和SynchronizedSortedMap
来源以获得见解:)Note that the methods which returns for example
Set
you'll need to wrap it inSynchronizedSet
as well. Again, see theSynchronizedMap
andSynchronizedSortedMap
sources for insights :)我不认为它(能够)是一个机械过程,因为它涉及很多因素.
I don't expect it to be (able to be) a mechanical process since it involves a lot of factors.
- Is it true that in general you can add
- Glancing at the source code for OpenJDK version of
- 是不是一般可以像这样添加
- 浏览
相关文章