AtomicBoolean vs Synchronized block,有什么区别
我试图了解以下两个代码块之间的区别
I am trying to understand the difference between the two following code blocks
AtomicBoolean ab = new AtomicBoolean(false);
using the following to get and set state. .
ab.get();
ab.set(X);
vs.
private boolean ab = false;
private final Object myboollock = new Ojbect();
public void setAB(boolean state)
{
synchronized(myboollock)
{
ab = state;
}
}
public boolean getAB()
{
synchronized(myboollock)
{
return ab;
}
}
我需要线程保护一个布尔值,仅此而已,并且有以前用过后来的方法,但是想开始用Atomic对象,(如果)它们是安全的?,
I need to thread protect a boolean, that is all, and have in the past used the later method, but would like to start to use Atomic objects, (if ) they are safe?,
推荐答案
这两个代码片段有一些细微的差别,但从外观上看是相似的:如果你调用 set
方法,随后调用 get
的其他线程将可以看到更改.
There are a few subtle differences but seen from the outside the two code snippets behave similarly: if you call the set
method, the change will be visible to other threads calling get
subsequently.
主要区别在于:
- 性能:根据争用的级别,您可能会使用
synchronized
或AtomicBoolean
获得更好的性能 - 原子性:如果在某个阶段您想做的不仅仅是设置布尔值,
synchronized
块将允许您以原子方式添加指令,但AtomicBoolean
不会
- performance: depending on the level of contention, you may get better performance with
synchronized
orAtomicBoolean
- atomicity: if at some stage you want to do more than just setting the boolean value, a
synchronized
block will allow you to add instructions atomically butAtomicBoolean
won't
相关文章