ORDER BY RAND() 和大表的问题
你好我今天早上问了一个问题,我意识到问题不是我在找的地方(这里是原始问题)
Hello I asked a question this morning, and I realized that the problem was not where I was looking (here the original question)
我有这个查询可以从地址簿中随机生成注册表.
I have this query to randomly generate registries from an address book.
SELECT * FROM address_book ab
WHERE
ab.source = "PB" AND
ab.city_id = :city_id AND
pb_campaign_id = :pb_campaign_id AND
ab.id NOT IN (SELECT address_book_id FROM calls WHERE calls.address_book_id = ab.id AND calls.status_id IN ("C","NO") OR (calls.status_id IN ("NR","OC") AND TIMESTAMPDIFF(MINUTE,calls.updated_at,NOW()) < 30))
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1';
但我注意到按 rand () 排序";花费超过 50 秒并使用高达 25-50% 的 CPU 和大表(100k +)所以我在这里寻找解决方案,但我没有找到任何有效的方法.注意:ids 不是自增的,可能会有差距
but I noticed that "order by rand ()" take more than 50s and use up to 25-50% CPU with large tables (100k +) so i looked for solutions here but i didn't find anything that worked. note: ids are not self-incrementing, there may be gaps
有什么想法吗?
推荐答案
我建议这样写:
SELECT *
FROM address_book ab
WHERE ab.source = 'PB' AND
ab.city_id = :city_id AND
pb_campaign_id = :pb_campaign_id AND
NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM calls c
WHERE c.address_book_id = ab.id AND
( c.status_id IN ('C', 'NO') OR
(c.status_id IN ('NR', 'OC') AND c.updated < now() - interval 30 minute)
)
)
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1;
请注意,这会更改相关子查询中的逻辑,因此 c.address_book_id = ab.id
始终适用.我怀疑这是性能问题.
Note that this changes the logic in the correlated subquery so c.address_book_id = ab.id
always applies. I suspect that is the issue with performance.
然后,在以下位置创建索引:
Then, create indexes on:
address_book(source, city_id, campaign_id, id)
调用(address_book_id、status_id、更新)
我猜这足以提高性能.如果碰巧有无数行符合条件,那么 order by rand()
可能是个问题.
I am guessing that this will be sufficient to improve performance. If there happen to be a zillion rows that match the conditions, then the order by rand()
might be an issue.
相关文章