QAbstractListModel 崩溃
我正在使用 QAbstractListModel 向 QML ListView 公开数据.除此之外使用 QML SectionScroller,它使用 get 和 data 函数.
I'm using QAbstractListModel to expose data to QML ListView. QML SectionScroller is used beside this, which uses get and data functions.
滚动一段时间后,出现崩溃.回溯是:
After some time of scrolling, a crash is experienced. The backtrace is:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
0x0000cdcc in QBasicAtomicInt::ref (
this=0x35)
at /usr/include/QtCore/qatomic_armv6.h:119
119 /usr/include/QtCore/qatomic_armv6.h: No such file or directory.
in /usr/include/QtCore/qatomic_armv6.h
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0000cdcc in QBasicAtomicInt::ref (
this=0x35)
at /usr/include/QtCore/qatomic_armv6.h:119
#1 0x0000f4e8 in QString (
this=0xbebf1a5c, other=...)
at /usr/include/QtCore/qstring.h:729
#2 [address] in IrregularVerb::getForm0
(this=0x92e428) at IrregularVerb.h:16
#3 0x0000e29c in IrregularListWrapper::data (this=0x92dd20, index=..., role=33)
at IrregularListWrapper.cpp:37
#4 0x4010e9c6 in ?? ()
from /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so.4
#5 0x4010e9c6 in ?? ()
from /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so.4
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
在其他设备上(第一个是 N900,第二个是 N950)回溯是类似的.它是 SIGSEGV 而不是 SIGILL,但除此之外,回溯是相同的.我注意到曾经有过一些字段在崩溃时变得空白的情况.(使用getForm0和getForm1的)
On other device (first is N900, the second N950) the backtrace is similar. It's SIGSEGV instead of SIGILL, but the backtrace is identical beside this. I noticed once a situtation where some of the fields have gotten blank at the moment on crash. (the ones using getForm0 and getForm1)
当我向返回的值添加额外的赋值时,在赋值时发生了崩溃.
When I added an extra assignement, to the returned value, the crash happened at the assignment.
一些重要的代码:
元素:
class IrregularVerb : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
Q_PROPERTY(QString form0 READ getForm0 CONSTANT)
Q_PROPERTY(QString form1 READ getForm1 CONSTANT)
Q_PROPERTY(QString form2 READ getForm2 CONSTANT)
public:
QString forms[3];
QString getForm0() const { return forms[0]; }
QString getForm1() const { return forms[1]; }
QString getForm2() const { return forms[2]; }
IrregularVerb(QString a, QString b, QString c) { forms[0] = a; forms[1] = b; forms[2] = c; }
};
型号:
class IrregularListWrapper : public QAbstractListModel
{
Q_OBJECT
Q_PROPERTY(QString langName READ getLangName NOTIFY langChanged)
Q_PROPERTY(int count READ rowCount NOTIFY langChanged)
Q_ENUMS(Language)
public:
Q_INVOKABLE int rowCount(const QModelIndex& = QModelIndex()) const { return db->count(); }
Q_INVOKABLE QObject* get(int index) const {return db->at(index);}
QVariant data(const QModelIndex &index, int role) const;
enum Language
{
English = 0,
German = 1
};
enum IrregularVerbRoles
{
Form0Role = Qt::UserRole + 1,
Form1Role,
Form2Role
};
IrregularListWrapper();
QString getLangName() const { return langName; }
Q_INVOKABLE void changeLang(Language l) { beginResetModel(); db = 0; setLang(l); endResetModel(); }
static QMap<Language, QString> plugins;
signals:
void langChanged();
protected:
void setLang(Language);
QString langName;
AbstractIrregularList * db;
};
QVariant IrregularListWrapper::data(const QModelIndex &index, int role) const
{
if (!index.isValid()) return QVariant();
int rowno = index.row();
qDebug() << "Row is " << index.row() << flush;
const IrregularVerb* verb = db->at(index.row());
switch (role)
{
case Form0Role:
return verb->getForm0();
break;
case Form1Role:
return verb->getForm1();
break;
case Form2Role:
return verb->getForm2();
break;
}
return QVariant();
}
AbstractIrregularList:
AbstractIrregularList:
class AbstractIrregularList : public QObject, public QList<IrregularVerb*>
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
void IV(const char* a, const char* b, const char* c) { append (new IrregularVerb(a, b, c)); }
void IV(const char *a, const char *b) { IV(a, b, b); }
void IV(const char *a) { IV(a,a,a); }
};
Q_DECLARE_INTERFACE(AbstractIrregularList, "com.marmistrz.Plugin.AbstractIrregularList/1.0");
你知道为什么会这样吗?谢谢!
Do you have an idea why it's happening? Thanks!
/edit1:感谢您的回复.这样可以吗?
/edit1: Thanks for your reply. Would this be ok?
Q_INVOKABLE QObject* get(int index)
{
QObject* item = db->at(index);
QDeclarativeEngine::setObjectOwnership(item, QDeclarativeEngine::CppOwnership);
item->setParent(this); // do I need to do this? An QList<QObject*>-child would clean it, right?
return item;
}
谢谢
推荐答案
看起来你在 QML 端使用 QAbstractListModel
有一个经典"问题.您的 IrregularListWrapper
具有 get
方法,该方法返回具有 JS 所有权的对象(这种所有权是 Q_INVOKABLE
方法的默认值),它们将被垃圾收集QML 端的 JS 引擎.为防止这种情况,您应该在将对象返回到 QML 之前更改对象的所有权 <代码>QDeclarativeEngine::setObjectOwnership.请参阅我的答案中的示例此处.
It looks like you have a "classic" problem using QAbstractListModel
on QML side. Your IrregularListWrapper
has get
method which returns objects with JS ownership (that kind of ownership is default for Q_INVOKABLE
methods) and they will be garbage collected with JS engine on QML side. To prevent this you should change objects' ownership before returning them to QML with QDeclarativeEngine::setObjectOwnership
. See example in my answer here.
相关文章