C++ 循环头包括

我知道之前有人问过与此类似的问题,但经过研究后,我仍然对循环标题包含有疑问.

I know that similar questions to this have been asked before but after doing my research I still have questions about circular header includes.

//FooA.h
#ifndef H_FOOA
#define H_FOOA

#include "foob.h"

class FooA{
   public:
      FooB *fooB;
};


//FooB.h
#ifndef H_FOOB
#define H_FOOB

class FooA;
class FooB{
   public:
      FooA *fooA;
};

现在,如果我有两个循环依赖项,这就是我在 stackoverflow 上看到人们解决问题的方式.我唯一的问题是,在我的 main.cpp 中,我必须先包含 fooa.h,然后再包含 foob.h

Now if I have two circular dependencies this is the way that I have seen people on stackoverflow get around the problem. My only problem with this is that in my main.cpp I must include fooa.h first and then foob.h

//main.cpp the right way
#include "fooa.h"
#include "foob.h"

//main.cpp that will surely get a compile error
#include "foob.h"
#include "fooa.h"

现在我的问题是有没有一种方法可以转发声明这些类,让我不必关心在 main.cpp 中包含头文件的顺序?"

Now my question is "Is there a way to forward declare these classes in a way that will allow me to not care about the order in which I include the header files in my main.cpp?"

推荐答案

有没有一种方法可以转发声明这些类,让我不必关心在 main.cpp 中包含头文件的顺序?

Is there a way to forward declare these classes in a way that will allow me to not care about the order in which I include the header files in my main.cpp?

由于您只处理简单的指针,因此您可以在这两种情况下使用前向声明:

since you are dealing with simple pointers only, you can use a forward declaration here in both cases:

FooA.h

#ifndef H_FOOA
#define H_FOOA

// #include "foob.h" << not needed!
class FooB;       // << substitute with a forward declaration of FooB

class FooA{
   public:
      FooB *fooB;
};
#endif

FooB.h

#ifndef H_FOOB
#define H_FOOB

class FooA;
class FooB{
   public:
      FooA *fooA;
};
#endif

相关文章