C++ 风格转换对性能的影响?
我是 C++ 样式转换的新手，我担心使用 C++ 样式转换会破坏我的应用程序的性能，因为我有一个 我的中断服务例程中的实时关键截止日期.
I am new to C++ style casts and I am worried that using C++ style casts will ruin the performance of my application because I have a real-time-critical deadline in my interrupt-service-routine.
我听说有些演员甚至会抛出异常！
I heard that some casts will even throw exceptions!
我想使用 C++ 风格的强制转换，因为它会使我的代码更加健壮".但是，如果有任何性能损失，那么我可能不会使用 C++ 风格的强制转换，而是花更多的时间测试使用 C 风格的强制转换的代码.
I would like to use the C++ style casts because it would make my code more "robust". However, if there is any performance hit then I will probably not use C++ style casts and will instead spend more time testing the code that uses C-style casts.
有没有人做过任何严格的测试/分析来比较 C++ 风格转换和 C 风格转换的性能?
Has anyone done any rigorous testing/profiling to compare the performance of C++ style casts to C style casts?
你的结果如何?
你得出了什么结论?
推荐答案
如果 C++ 风格的强制转换可以在概念上被 C 风格的强制转换替换，那么就不会有开销.如果不能，如 dynamic_cast 的情况，没有 C 等效项，您必须以某种方式支付成本.
If the C++ style cast can be conceptualy replaced by a C-style cast there will be no overhead. If it can't, as in the case of dynamic_cast, for which there is no C equivalent, you have to pay the cost one way or another.
以如下代码为例:
int x;
float f = 123.456;
x = (int) f;
x = static_cast<int>(f);
使用 VC++ 为两个强制转换生成相同的代码 - 代码是:
generates identical code for both casts with VC++ - code is:
00401041 fld dword ptr [ebp-8]
00401044 call __ftol (0040110c)
00401049 mov dword ptr [ebp-4],eax
在转换为引用时，唯一可以抛出的 C++ 转换是 dynamic_cast.为避免这种情况，请转换为指针，如果转换失败，它将返回 0.
The only C++ cast that can throw is dynamic_cast when casting to a reference. To avoid this, cast to a pointer, which will return 0 if the cast fails.
相关文章