C++ 中的重载 lambda 以及 clang 和 gcc 之间的差异
我正在玩一个在 C++ 中重载 lambdas 的技巧.具体:
I'm playing with a trick to overload lambdas in C++. Specifically:
// For std::function
#include <functional>
// For std::string
#include <string>
// For std::cout
#include <iostream>
template <class... F>
struct overload : F... {
overload(F... f) : F(f)... {}
};
template <class... F>
auto make_overload(F... f) {
return overload<F...>(f...);
}
int main() {
std::function <int(int,int)> f = [](int x,int y) {
return x+y;
};
std::function <double(double,double)> g = [](double x,double y) {
return x+y;
};
std::function <std::string(std::string,std::string)> h = [](std::string x,std::string y) {
return x+y;
};
auto fgh = make_overload(f,g,h);
std::cout << fgh(1,2) << std::endl;
std::cout << fgh(1.5,2.5) << std::endl;
std::cout << fgh("bob","larry") << std::endl;
}
现在，上面的程序在clang中编译并运行良好:
Now, the above program compiles and works fine in clang:
$ clang++ -g -std=c++14 test01.cpp -o test01
$ ./test01
3
4
boblarry
它不会在 gcc 中编译:
It does not compile in gcc:
$ g++ -g -std=c++14 test01.cpp -o test01
test01.cpp: In function 'int main()':
test01.cpp:36:25: error: request for member 'operator()' is ambiguous
std::cout << fgh(1,2) << std::endl;
^
In file included from test01.cpp:5:0:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: candidates are: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = std::basic_string<char>; _ArgTypes = {std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >}]
function<_Res(_ArgTypes...)>::
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = double; _ArgTypes = {double, double}]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = int; _ArgTypes = {int, int}]
test01.cpp:37:29: error: request for member 'operator()' is ambiguous
std::cout << fgh(1.5,2.5) << std::endl;
^
In file included from test01.cpp:5:0:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: candidates are: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = std::basic_string<char>; _ArgTypes = {std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >}]
function<_Res(_ArgTypes...)>::
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = double; _ArgTypes = {double, double}]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = int; _ArgTypes = {int, int}]
test01.cpp:38:35: error: request for member 'operator()' is ambiguous
std::cout << fgh("bob","larry") << std::endl;
^
In file included from test01.cpp:5:0:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: candidates are: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = std::basic_string<char>; _ArgTypes = {std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >}]
function<_Res(_ArgTypes...)>::
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = double; _ArgTypes = {double, double}]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include/g++-v4/functional:2434:5: note: _Res std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>::operator()(_ArgTypes ...) const [with _Res = int; _ArgTypes = {int, int}]
Makefile:2: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 1
为什么会有不同?作为记录，我使用的是 gcc 4.9.2 和 clang 3.5.0.
Why is there a difference? For the record, I'm using gcc 4.9.2 and clang 3.5.0.
显然，这段代码也无法在 VC 上编译，并且已经报告.话虽如此，Sean Middleditch 发布了重载代码的工作版本:
Evidently, this snippet of code failed to compile on VC as well and had already been reported. That being said, Sean Middleditch posted a working version of the overloaded code:
template<class F1, class... Fs>
struct overload : F1, overload<Fs...>
{
using F1::operator();
using overload<Fs...>::operator();
overload(F1 f1, Fs... fs) : F1(f1), overload<Fs...>(fs...) {}
};
template<class F1>
struct overload<F1> : F1
{
using F1::operator();
overload(F1 f1) : F1(f1) {}
};
template <class... F>
auto make_overload(F... f) {
return overload<F...>(f...);
}
我仍然有兴趣了解为什么这个版本的重载 lambda 代码可以工作，但原始版本不行.
I'm still interested in understanding why this version of the overloaded lambda code works, but the original one does not.
推荐答案
在我看来像是 Clang 错误.
Looks like a Clang bug to me.
一般规则是不同基类中同名的成员函数不重载.例如:
The general rule is that member functions of the same name in different base classes do not overload. For example:
struct Foo { void bar(); };
struct Baz { void bar(int); };
struct Quux : Foo, Baz { };
int main() { Quux().bar(); } // error on both GCC and Clang
无论出于何种原因，Clang 未能诊断 operator() 的这种歧义.
For whatever reason, Clang fails to diagnose this ambiguity for operator().
using-declaration 将命名的基类成员提升到派生类范围，允许它们重载.因此:
A using-declaration lifts the named base class members to the derived class scope, allowing them to overload. Hence:
struct Quux_2 : Foo, Baz { using Foo::bar; using Baz::bar; };
Quux_2().bar(); // OK.
在代码的工作版本中，using 声明递归地将模板参数中的每个 operator() 声明带入最派生类的范围，允许它们超载.
In the working version of the code, the using declarations recursively bring every operator() declaration in the template arguments into the scope of the most derived class, allowing them to overload.
相关文章