模拟函数以引发异常以测试 except 块
问题描述
我有一个函数 (foo
),它调用另一个函数 (bar
).如果调用bar()
引发了HttpError
,如果状态码是404我想特别处理,否则重新引发.
I have a function (foo
) which calls another function (bar
). If invoking bar()
raises an HttpError
, I want to handle it specially if the status code is 404, otherwise re-raise.
我正在尝试围绕这个 foo
函数编写一些单元测试,模拟对 bar()
的调用.不幸的是,我无法获得对 bar()
的模拟调用来引发我的 except
块捕获的异常.
I am trying to write some unit tests around this foo
function, mocking out the call to bar()
. Unfortunately, I am unable to get the mocked call to bar()
to raise an Exception which is caught by my except
block.
这是说明我的问题的代码:
Here is my code which illustrates my problem:
import unittest
import mock
from apiclient.errors import HttpError
class FooTests(unittest.TestCase):
@mock.patch('my_tests.bar')
def test_foo_shouldReturnResultOfBar_whenBarSucceeds(self, barMock):
barMock.return_value = True
result = foo()
self.assertTrue(result) # passes
@mock.patch('my_tests.bar')
def test_foo_shouldReturnNone_whenBarRaiseHttpError404(self, barMock):
barMock.side_effect = HttpError(mock.Mock(return_value={'status': 404}), 'not found')
result = foo()
self.assertIsNone(result) # fails, test raises HttpError
@mock.patch('my_tests.bar')
def test_foo_shouldRaiseHttpError_whenBarRaiseHttpErrorNot404(self, barMock):
barMock.side_effect = HttpError(mock.Mock(return_value={'status': 500}), 'error')
with self.assertRaises(HttpError): # passes
foo()
def foo():
try:
result = bar()
return result
except HttpError as error:
if error.resp.status == 404:
print '404 - %s' % error.message
return None
raise
def bar():
raise NotImplementedError()
我按照 Mock docs 说您应该将 Mock
实例的 side_effect
设置为 Exception
类,以使模拟函数引发错误.
I followed the Mock docs which say that you should set the side_effect
of a Mock
instance to an Exception
class to have the mocked function raise the error.
我还查看了一些其他相关的 StackOverflow Q&As,看起来我正在做与他们正在做的事情相同的事情,以导致他们的模拟引发异常.
I also looked at some other related StackOverflow Q&As, and it looks like I am doing the same thing they are doing to cause and Exception to be raised by their mock.
- https://stackoverflow.com/a/10310532/346561
- 如何使用 Python Mock 引发异常 - 但将 Errno 设置为给定值
为什么设置 barMock
的 side_effect
不会引发预期的 Exception
?如果我在做一些奇怪的事情,我应该如何在我的 except
块中测试逻辑?
Why is setting the side_effect
of barMock
not causing the expected Exception
to be raised? If I am doing something weird, how should I go about testing logic in my except
block?
解决方案
你的 mock 可以很好地引发异常,但是缺少 error.resp.status
值.与其使用 return_value
,不如告诉 Mock
status
是一个属性:
Your mock is raising the exception just fine, but the error.resp.status
value is missing. Rather than use return_value
, just tell Mock
that status
is an attribute:
barMock.side_effect = HttpError(mock.Mock(status=404), 'not found')
Mock()
的附加关键字参数被设置为结果对象的属性.
Additional keyword arguments to Mock()
are set as attributes on the resulting object.
我将您的 foo
和 bar
定义放在 my_tests
模块中,并添加到 HttpError
class 所以我可以使用它也一样,然后你的测试就可以成功了:
I put your foo
and bar
definitions in a my_tests
module, added in the HttpError
class so I could use it too, and your test then can be ran to success:
>>> from my_tests import foo, HttpError
>>> import mock
>>> with mock.patch('my_tests.bar') as barMock:
... barMock.side_effect = HttpError(mock.Mock(status=404), 'not found')
... result = my_test.foo()
...
404 -
>>> result is None
True
您甚至可以看到 print '404 - %s' % error.message
行运行,但我认为您想在那里使用 error.content
;无论如何,这就是 HttpError()
从第二个参数设置的属性.
You can even see the print '404 - %s' % error.message
line run, but I think you wanted to use error.content
there instead; that's the attribute HttpError()
sets from the second argument, at any rate.
相关文章